Anyone with an ounce of common sense can immediately deduce that the absurd financial fairy story, entitled the 'Herbalife MLM income opportunity' (which its authors have peddled as reality), is far too good to be true. However, various free-thinking commentators have also pointed out that 'Herbalife' is not just a simple pyramid fraud.
Self-evidently 'Herbalife' has exhibited the universal identifying characteristics of a cult. As such, 'Herbalife' is neither original nor unique. Consequently, it cannot be fully-understood in isolation. Classically (although it will be difficult for many external observers to accept), when its hidden interior is rigorously examined, 'Herbalife' can be easily compared to all-manner of structurally-similar, criminogenic groups, including 'Scientology' and the 'Second Ku Klux Klan.'
|The author of the kitsch 'Herblife' lie, Mark Hughes, |
playing the role of ordinary man turned superman.
|'MLM Income Opportunity' racketeer, Michael Johnson, peddling the 'Herbalife' lie|
It is no exaggeration to say that, due to the amount of money it has already unlawfully generated, the pernicious 'Herbalife' lie represents an ongoing threat to democracy and the rule of law. Michael Johnson and his associates (a gang of otherwise mediocre parasites) should have long-since been recognised as cultic racketeers peddling a self-perpetuating illusion of Utopia (built from their victims' money), and all of their stolen wealth confiscated.
|A rare glimpse of the real L. Ron.Hubbard ('Scientology' propagandists have claimed that this seedy character living in squalor, is 'an imposter').|
History teaches us that the more capital narcissistic charlatans like Michael Johnson and L. Ron Hubbard, unlawfully acquire: the more dangerously-dissociated from external reality they (and their deluded core-adherents) can become, whilst the more difficult it becomes to hold them fully to account for their crimes.
David Brear (copyright 2013)
'The Universal Identifying Characteristics of a Cult' (David Brear, Axiom Books, copyright 2005):
Apart from its use in the sense of ‘a popular fashion especially followed by a specific section of society’ or ‘a person or thing popularised in this way,’ the traditional definition of the English noun, cult (Latin cultus worship), has been ‘a system of religious worship (Latin religiosus obligation, bondage) especially as expressed in ritual,’ or ‘devotion or homage to a person or thing.’ However, the word is now also used as shorthand for what is more accurately described as a pernicious cult. This evolving, criminogenic phenomenon can be briefly described as:
any self-perpetuating, non-rational/esoteric, ritual belief system established or perverted for the clandestine purpose of human exploitation.
Such groups are identified by the following, essential characteristics:
- has a grandiose sense of self-importance.
- is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, ideal love, etc.
- believes that he/she is special and unique and can only be understood by other special people.
- requires excessive admiration.
- strong sense of self-entitlement.
- takes advantage of others to achieve his/her own ends.
- lacks empathy.
- is often envious or believes that others are envious of him/her.
- arrogant disposition.
A COMMON SENSE APPROACH TO CULTISM
Cultism is a trap. Obviously, anyone who only examines the bait in a trap and who remains unaware of its true purpose, risks getting caught themselves. Just like a mousetrap, the basic design for the cultic trap has remained the same down the centuries even if the presentation of the bait has become evermore sophisticated. Sadly, many commentators have found it impossible - when faced with the apparently illogical results of cultism - to abandon their existing academic, and professional, disciplines, which are anchored in the logic of the traditional world. Consequently, their understanding has often been made impossible by misplaced objectivity. However, it must be remembered that a counterfeit banknote might be 99.9 % perfect, but the bit that is not makes all of it a fake. Similarly, in order to have any chance of understanding cultism, it must be approached from the apparently subjective point of view that its results are always the product of a contagious deception, the victims of which unconsciously accept fiction as fact. Only then, can the phenomenon be examined with genuine objectivity. Once this vital principle has been learned, the apparently authentic words and images reflected by persons under the influence of cultism - like those printed on counterfeit banknotes - are revealed as dangerous distractions. They should never be taken at face value and, therefore, I try to remind the reader of this at all times. Any commentator who repeats the reality-inverting shielding-terminology of any cultic group, but without detailed qualification (or heavy irony), demonstrates that he/she remains at a pitifully low-level of understanding.
Whilst it remains generally misunderstood, cultism will continue to be an unnecessary threat to the lives, liberty and happiness of all communities, families and individuals all over the world.