Young children’s unconscious acceptance of ‘Santa Claus’ as total reality, stems from a fictitious scenario reflected as fact by the traditional culture in which they live. Up to a certain age, children are not equipped to challenge the model of reality offered to them by authoritarian figures within their family groups; particularly, their parents. Therefore, once children have been converted to a self-gratifying, non-rational belief in ‘Santa,’ the truth (that they are actually being deceived by the people whom they instinctively love, trust and follow) is unthinkable.
|Negative / Positive|
The scenario can then be expanded to modify children’s behaviour — ‘Santa’ has magical powers… he can see and hear everything they do at all times… he will reward them for unquestioning belief and punish them for dissent. Only when they attain the necessary level of intellectual/psychological development, can children begin to use their critical and evaluative faculties and come to realise that ‘Santa’ is merely a game of make believe.
If you think about it, what I’ve just described is the most elementary form of self-perpetuating, non-rational/esoteric, ritual belief system - perfectly tailored to fit infantile minds, and reliant on the maintenance of an absolute monopoly of information presented using a constant repetition of reality-inverting key words and images combined with pseudo-scientific mystification and closed-logic.
|Naughty or Nice?|
When analysed with the same level of intellectual rigour, many of the basic procedures and conditions required to establish cultic groups turn out not to be a mystery at all. They are revealed as only more-sophisticated versions of those which also propagate the benign ‘Santa’ deception. As such, they are frighteningly easy to replicate. However, the instigators of cults are anything but benign and, interestingly, many of their most-deluded subjects and convincing apologists turn out to be well-educated adults who have simply become incapable of facing the ego-destroying reality that they’ve been fooled by what is merely a game of make believe.
This principal relies on Judges being of a high moral and intellectual calibre.
The problem here, is that this Supreme Court ruling is an interpretation of a recent law which prohibits 'religious' discrimination in Britain, but for some mysterious reason, 'religion' was not defined in the anti-discrimination law. This means, that it has been left to the members of the Supreme Court to fill in the gap, but what they have come up with, demonstrates that they had a pitifully low-level of understanding of the criminogenic phenomenon lurking behind Louisa Hodkin's angelic smile and 'religious' jargon.
When this issue was being debated in parliament, certain members did try to point out the danger in having an anti-religious discrimination law which did not define religion. I believe 'Scientology' was actually mentioned at the time by members of the Conservative opposition, but these common-sense fears were brushed aside by members of the Labour government, who said that 'Scientology' was not considered to be a religion in an existing High Court ruling, and that this situation would not alter.
In other words, either the Labour government, and its advisers, made a huge error of judgement, or someone was telling lies.
Thus, the only way that this recent unsafe ruling can be overturned, would be for the Conservative government immediately to change the existing legislation and introduce a brief legal definition of 'religion,' but specifying that, without exception, all organizations styled as 'religious,' but which can be, or have been, proven to have been engaged in a chronic pattern of unlawful activity, would not be granted the privileges accorded to religions, or would risk being sanctioned by the loss of all such privileges.
(NB. In the definitive UK Supreme Court Ruling, handed down in December 2013, which apparently granted the US-based organization known as 'Scientology,' legal status of 'religion' in the UK, and which was widely reported as containing a new legal definition of religion in Britain, Lord Toulson took great pains to emphasise that the Supreme Court had not, in fact, produced a 'definitive formula,' but merely a 'description' of religion).
Without naming names, at about the same time that I published my article, I had a long conversation with a young (?) fellow (a spokesman for the UK Supreme Court). Even though I carefully explained to this undoubtedly well-educated person that :
- more than half a century of evidence, proves beyond all reasonable doubt that what has laughably been labelled 'Dianetics,' is nothing more than an absurd, cultic pseudo-science, and that the impressive-sounding made-up term 'Church of Scientology' is, therefore, part of an extensive, thought-stopping, non-traditional jargon which has been developed, and constantly-repeated, by the instigator, and associates, of an ongoing, major, organized crime group (hiding behind a labyrinth of legally-registered corporate structures) to shut-down the critical, and evaluative, faculties of victims, and of casual observers, in order to perpetrate, and dissimulate, a blame-the-victim advance fee fraud (dressed up as 'religious/self-betterment/spiritual' programs) and various other related-abuses of trust; -
'If criminal acts have taken place in the UK, then the victims should report them to law enforcement agencies: not to the Supreme Court.'
When I then asked:
To which agency of UK law enforcement does one report ongoing 'criminal acts' which include the perpetrators using de facto agents to deceive members of the UK Supreme Court into granting them official tax-free religious status, thus preventing victims from facing reality and complaining?,
there was no reply.
LRH'll fix it.
Today, it is very difficult to determine the exact total number of persons around the world who have been churned through the pay-through-the-nose-to-play 'Scientology' cultic game of make-believe, since it was first peddled as reality by L. Ron Hubbard, under the comic-book title of 'Dianetics, The Modern Science of Mental Health,' back in the early 1950s. It is also important to distinguish between chronic, and short-term, losing players. One thing is certain, the overwhelming majority of 'Scientology' victims have remained silent and continue (unconsciously) to form part of the overall lie: whilst, as a direct result of the passivity of the overwhelming majority of the victims, all casual observers of 'Scientology' (including, law enforcement agents, regulators, academics, legislators, judges, journalists, etc.) have also remained passive and continue (unconsciously) to form part of the overall lie.
Jimmy Savile - Britain's most-notorious and prolific paedo-sexual predator.
For decades, hundreds of Savile's victims remained silent and continued to form part of the overall lie that the outrageously-kitsch DJ couldn't possibly be a perverted criminal. As a direct result of the passivity of the overwhelming majority of Savile's victims, all casual observers also remained passive and continued (unconsciously) to form part of the overall lie.
The short answer to the second of these frequently-asked questions, is that the overwhelming majority of all the countless millions of victims who have continued to get burned by individual 'MLM Income Opportunity/Prosperity Gospel' cults, have remained silent and will continue (unconsciously) to form part of the overall lie: whilst, as a direct result of the passivity of the overwhelming majority of the victims, all casual observers of individual 'MLM income opportunity/Prosperity Gospel' cults (including, law enforcement agents, regulators, academics, legislators, judges, journalists, etc.) have also remained passive and will continue (unconsciously) to form part of the overall lie.
|Carl. F. Rehnborg|
Today, it is very difficult to determine exactly how many people in total around the world have already been churned through the pay-through-the-nose-to-play 'MLM Income Opportunity/Prosperity Gospel' cultic game of make-believe, since it was first peddled as reality by Carl F. Rehnborg, under the name of 'Nutrilite Inc. /Mytinger and Casselberry Inc.' back in the late 1940s. It is also important to distinguish between short-term and chronic 'MLM' losing-players. In general, the overwhelming majority of fraud victims never complain, but, right from the outset, the self-perpetuating 'MLM Income Opportunity/Prosperity Gospel' lie was maliciously designed to implicate its victims - loading them with shame and guilt, and, thus, prevent them from ever facing reality. Classically, the quantifiable evidence proves that, without exception, chronic 'MLM' losing-players have been subjected to co-ordinated devious techniques of social, and psychological, persuasion designed to shut down their critical, and evaluative, faculties. In this way, they have been conditioned (unconsciously) to think of themselves, not as the victims of a cruel deception or as brainwashed cult adherents, but as 'Independent Business Owners' exercising free-will. What has made external reality even more unacceptable, is the ego-destroying fact that a large proportion of 'MLM' victims were deceived by a close friend or relative (acting under the guided-delusion that 'MLM' has been of great benefit to its participants) and, in turn, these victims then deceived, or tried to deceive, their own close friends and relatives (acting under the same guided-delusion that 'MLM' has been of great benefit to its participants). The few, destitute, chronic former 'MLM' losing-players who have managed to recover fully their critical, and evaluative faculties, and who have filed well-informed civil lawsuits against the corporate fronts of 'MLM' cultic racketeers, have invariably been obliged to settle out of court. Although a number of isolated civil investigations, and successful prosecutions, have been pursued by the Federal Trade Commission against some smaller 'MLM' front-companies in the USA, no co-ordinated official effort has ever been made to face wider-reality and identify, let alone tackle, the overall criminogenic/cultic phenomenon that has lurked behind all the shielding layers of structural, and pseudo-economic/scientific, mystification, reality-inverting 'direct selling/commercial' jargon and kitsch capitalist/Utopian/American Dream imagery.
Until the 1970s, the original 'MLM Income Opportunity/Prosperity Gospel' cultic racket 'Nutrilite' a.k.a.'Amway,' remained confined to the USA. In the face of a prolonged (but far-from morally, or intellectually, rigorous) FTC investigation, the 'Amway/MLM' lie first spread to Canada, then to W. Europe and Australia. However, in 1979, when a corrupt, and/or naive, US federal judge failed to identify 'Amway' as the corporate-front for an ongoing, major, organized crime group, this classic regulatory-failure was widely-seen as a license to steal. Since that time, countless US-based copy-cat rackets have been instigated behind labyrinths of legally-registered corporate structures pursuing lawful, and/or unlawful, enterprises - a significant number of which ('Forever Living Products', 'Herbalife', 'USANA', 'Nu Skin', 'Xango' etc.), have been allowed to grow out of control and to infiltrate traditional culture all around the globe, accompanied by a distracting flock of co-opted political, academic and celebrity stooges, and shielded by a parallel labyrinth of legally-registered corporate structures known as, 'Direct Selling Associations.'
In the past, various casual observers have thrown up their hands in horror when I have dared to say that, given its duration, scale and devastating impact on huge numbers of vulnerable persons, blame-the-victim 'MLM Income Opportunity/Prosperity Gospel' cultic racketeering is an ongoing financial, and psychological, holocaust (with a small 'h') of which many people have been in denial. Sadly, the essentially-absurd fairy story entitled 'MLM' has been allowed to expand to such titanic proportions, that the truth has long-since become almost unthinkable. However, since the concept of the big propaganda lie, is widely-understood, it seems almost inconceivable that the directors of law enforcement, and intelligence, agencies around the world have also remained unable to look beyond the ends of their noses and identify what the bosses of 'MLM/Prosperity Gospel' cults have actually been doing.
never allow the public to cool off;
never admit a fault or wrong;
never concede that there may be some good in your enemy;
never leave room for alternatives;
never accept blame;
concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong;
people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.'
'... in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad mass of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly outrageous lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.'
|Adolf'll fix it! - It was good while it lasted.|
For decades, Jimmy Savile was a national celebrity in Britain. Today, he is universally recognised as a callous and cunning sex offender who hid in plain view by grooming not only his victims, but also the British nation. Yet when the mainstream UK media reported the death of a 'British Icon/legend,' Sir James Wilson Vincent Savile OBE KCSG (1926-2011), his official obituaries were all respectful and positive. That said, it is highly-revealing to note that little was made of the fact that Savile lived and died alone, whilst the editors of certain well-known publications were so lazy that they couldn't even be bothered to find an accurate spelling of his name.
|Jimmy Savile presenting Elvis with a gold disc, 1960.|
|Jimmy Savile hanging out with the 'Beatles,' 1967.|
|Clair McAlpine committed suicide in 1971.|
|Janet Cope worked for Savile for 28 years and claimed to be the only person who really knew him.|
|Former BBC chauffeur, David Smith|