On this thought-provoking Blog, Englishman, David Brear, guides us to the dark heart of a modern-day, totalitarian labyrinth and shines a piercing light on its manipulative rulers and manipulated inhabitants. First, he provides a spool of unbreakable thread so that we can all find our way safely home. Blog readers may contact David Brear via: axiombooks@wanadoo.fr
In 1945, whilst most, contemporary mainstream commentators were unable to look beyond the ends of their noses, with a perfect sense of irony,'George Orwell'(1903-1950) presented fact asfictionin an insightful'fairy story'entitled,'Animal Farm.'Herevealed that totalitarianism is merely the oppressors'fiction mistaken forfactby the oppressed. In the same universal allegory, Orwelldescribed how, at a time of vulnerability, almost any people's dream of a future, secure, Utopian existence can be hung over the entrance to a totalitarian deception. Indeed, the words that are always banished by totalitarian deceivers are, 'totalitarian' and 'deception.' Sadly, when it comes to examining the same enduring phenomenon, albeit with an ephemeral 'American/Capitalist'label, most contemporary, mainstream commentators have again been unable to look further than the ends of their noses. However, if they followedOrwell's example, and did some serious thinking, this is the reality-inverting nightmare they would find.
Whilst watching this kitsch video of the 'Amway' fairy story, keep in mind that the quantifiable evidence proves (beyond all reasonable doubt) that, since 1959, tens of millions of individuals around the world have been churned through the so-called'Amway income opportunity' whilst the overall, hidden net-loss/churn rate for so-called 'Amway Independent Business Owners' is effectively-100%
Again bearing the above in mind, back in the late 1990s, I contacted (separately) two (apparentlyindependent) 'cult advice associations' (legally-registered as ‘charities’ in the UK), ‘Catalyst’ and the ‘Cult Information Centre.’I had an urgent enquiry about‘Amway.’I was obviously upset and in quite a vulnerable state, but I clearly explained to their directors that my brother (a teacher living in the north of England) had completely changed personality and become a would-be 'Amway millionaire.' I also clearly explained that my confused, widowed, elderly mother (with whom my brother was now living and who's large house he had turned into an 'Amway' recruitment centre) was in the process of signing over all my family's considerable capital assets into my brother's name.
Ian Howarth
Graham Baldwin
In ignorance, I had assumed that Graham Baldwin (Director of ‘Catalyst’) and Ian Howarth (Director of ‘CIC’)were free-thinking individuals who specialised in the study of cults, and who provided independent free advice, and accurate information, to enquirers. However, both systematically excluded all quantifiable evidence to the contrary and they began to gaslight me - pretending that‘Amway’ is a multi-national corporationoffering individuals a business/income opportunity which a minority of participants have imagined to be a pyramid scam because they have lost money. They insisted that my concerns about ‘Amway’ being a cult were ridiculous, unfounded rumours spread by the organization’s commercial competitors and repeated by biased and ill-informed journalists. This was apparently in reference to‘Amway’ having been profiled in the UK (in 1994) in a major ‘Time Out’ magazine article entitled, ‘Hidden Persuaders.' The article was published despite typical (empty) threats from the legal representatives of ‘Amway UK.’ In fact, Graham Baldwin was even briefly mentioned as a 'London-based cult adviser and former University Chaplain' who had received various calls fromconcerned 'Amway' adherents. Other, newspaper reports, variously described Baldwin as a 'former Army, or Military, Intelligence officer.'
After conducting further research, I discovered that Ian Howarth has absolutely no qualifications relevant to the cult phenomenon, whilst Graham Baldwin obtained a standard degree in 'religious studies' at Kings College London in 1986. Baldwin then persuaded members of the faculty of Kings College that there was a growing problem with cult recruiters on campus, and that he was going to tackle it by offering information and advice to students. This led to Graham Baldwin briefly styling himself as 'Chaplain' (a meaningless, but impressive, title). When I made enquiries to the religious studies Dept. of Kings College London to establish whether Mr. Baldwin had once been employed there, and why he had suddenly abandoned his self-appointed post of 'Chaplain,' I was contacted by the college's aggressive legal representative who informed me that, due to data protection legislation,none of my questions could be answered. However, when Icontacted the UK Ministry of Defence, I discovered that Graham Baldwin's career as James Bond, is a fabrication.
The 1994 ‘special investigation’ published in 'Time Out' by News/features Editor, Tony Thompson, was headed:
‘Amway says it can make you rich beyond your dreams with its multi-level marketing system; critics say it only makes money for a very few at the top, and its techniques are worryingly cult-like.’
Far from being ill-informed, Tony Thompson had cited in his article the work of Professor Robert Jay Lifton who, in 1961 (after 10 years of detailed research, interviewing US servicemen held prisoner during the Korean War), published, ‘Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism.’ In this standard, medical text-book, Dr. Lifton identified 8 ‘themes’ which, if present in any group, indicate that its members are being subjected to a mixture of social, psychological and physical pressures, designed to produce radical changes in their individual beliefs, attitudes and behaviour.
1).‘Milieu control’— the attempted control of everything an individual experiences (i.e. sees, hears, reads, writes and expresses). This includes discouraging subjects from contacting friends and relatives outside the group and undermining trust in exterior sources of information; particularly, the independent media.
2).‘Personal or mystical manipulation’ — charismatic (psychologically dominant) leaders create a separate environment where specific behaviour is required; leading to group members believing that they have been chosen and that they have a special purpose. Normally group members will insist that they have not been coerced into group membership, and that their new way of life and beliefs are the result of a completely free-choice.
3). ‘Demand for purity’ — everything in life becomes either pure or impure, negative or positive, etc. This builds up a sense of shame and guilt. The idea is promoted that there is no alternative method of thinking or middle way, to that promoted by the group or by those outside it. Everything in life is either good or bad and anything is justified provided the group sanctions it as good.
4). ‘Confession’— personal weaknesses are admitted to, to demonstrate how group membership can transform an individual. Group members often have to rewrite their personal histories and those of their friends and relatives, denigrating their previous lives and relationships. Other techniques include group members writing personal reports on themselves and others. Outsiders are presented as a threat who will only try to return group members to their former incorrect thinking.
5). ‘Sacred science’ — the belief in an inexplicable power system or secret knowledge, derived from a hierarchy who must be copied and who cannot be challenged. Often the group’s leaders claim to be followers of traditional historical figures (particularly, established political, scientific and religious thinkers). Leaders promote the idea that their own teaching will also benefit the entire world, and it should be spread.
6). ‘Loading the language’ — a separate vocabulary used to bond the group together and short-circuit critical thought processes. This can become second nature within the group, and talking to outsiders can become difficult and embarrassing. Derogatory names, or directly racist terms, are often given to outsiders.
7). ‘Doctrine over persons’ — individual members are taught to alter their own view of themselves before they entered the group. Former attitudes and behaviour must then be re-interpreted as worthless, and/or dangerous, using the new values of the group.
8).‘Dispensing of existence’ — promotion of the belief that outsiders — particularly, those who disagree with the teaching of the group — are inferior and are doomed. Therefore, they can be manipulated, and/or cheated, and/or dispossessed, and/or destroyed. This is justifiable, because outsiders only represent a danger to salvation.
In 1994 'Amway' claimed '73 000 Independent Business Owners' in the UK, but the company acknowledged a staggering annual churn-rate of at least 50%. Tony Thompson discovered that almost all 'Amway' adherents were losing money (some to the tune of tens of thousands of £), whilst the majority of financial activity within the ranks of the organization in the UK, was actually the sale of publications, recordings, tickets to meetings, etc., on the pretext that these 'optional' materials were 'vital to achieving total financial freedom.'
Tony Thompson also discovered that, since 1973, the UK branch of this fraud had secretly generated hundreds of millions of pounds in cash (without the payment of UK tax) and that it was being run behind various (apparently independent) UK-registered corporate fronts, including, 'International Business Systems UK,' but that the bulk of the illegal profits were being shipped to'Amway Diamonds'in the USA, like 'Pastor'Dexter Yager.
In other words, the so-called 'Amway MLM income opportunity'is the bait in a cultic trap.
Almost a decade after Tony Thompson's 'Time Out' article exposing 'Amway, ' American network television discovered the identical racket in the USA, but hidden behind the corporate front of 'Quixtar.'
From my own disturbing experience with members of my family, after reading Tony Thompson’s article and examining other similar evidence collected by the French cult advice association, UNADFI (Union of Associations for the Defence of the Family and the Individual), I had immediately realized that my brother (at a vulnerable time in his life) had (in exchange for an illusory Utopianoffer of 'future freedom, prosperity and happiness') sold his soul to a gang of American-based racketeers. I also realized that all Lifton's published ‘thought reform themes’ were present within ‘Amway.’ However, this obvious analysis was systematically rejected by Messrs. Baldwin and Howarth. Laughably, they actually tried to undermine my trust in the independent media (an information-control technique, clearly-explained in the first of Lifton's 'themes'). Yet, at this time, Baldwin admitted to having around 70 ‘Amway clients’ on file, whilst Howarth acknowledged having at least 50.When I asked: Exactly why , if 'Amway'wasn't a cult, had all these people contacted 'Catalyst' and the'Cult Information Centre'?; and: If any ‘Amway clients’had been passed on to legislators, law enforcement agents or to journalists in the UK?; Messrs. Baldwin and Howarth refused to reply. Furthermore, they then began to challenge the authenticity of my own encounter with ‘Amway.’When I refused to accept their inflexible opinion of ‘Amway’ as 'non-cultic,'both posed as innocent victims under attack. They pretendedmoral and intellectual authority, treating me as though I had absolutely no right to question them, because they were experts.I was finally asked for money by Ian Howarth in return for his ‘advice,’whilst Graham Baldwin told me that he had once been an ‘officer in British Army Intelligence’ and that although he didn't 'charge for advice,' it was customary to give his charity a 'donation.' I later discovered that, at the time I contacted them, Messrs. Baldwin and Howarth were both under contract to ‘Amway UK Ltd.’ as ‘consultants.’I had, in fact, been speaking to the de facto agents of the ‘Amway’leadership. I am reliably informed that not long after I had contact with them, Mr. Howarth (and possibly Mr. Baldwin) had direct contact with my mother, to whom he was presented by my brother as a 'cult expert'.Obviously, he never declared his connections with 'Amway.' In this way, an unqualified charlatan convinced my mother (who had begun to have some doubts) that 'Amway' is not cultic and that I was dangerously-deluded to say so.Indeed, she subsequently became totally-convinced that I was being paid by the British inventor/industrialist, James Dyson (who was in litigation with 'Amway'in the USA), to defame 'Amway' in the UK, and she even signed (along with my brother) a false deposition stating that I had made a full-confession. My mother died in 2004, never having recovered her critical and evaluative faculties.
Unfortunately, since the mid 1990s, Messrs. Baldwin and Howarth have been allowed to promote themselves as 'cult experts' whilst simultaneously living off funds deriving from a classic blame-the-victim, cultic racket. Indeed it's not just the 'Amway'racketeers who have paid them. Despite their self-righteous façade ofhonesty and philanthropy, the clandestine activities of these two in Europe, on behalf of their billionaire American paymasters,undoubtedly forms part of a pattern of ongoing, major racketeering activity (as defined by the US federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 1970).
As a result of my persistent complaints, the UK government tried, but mysteriously failed, to have 'Amway UK Ltd.'closed down as a dissimulated pyramid scheme in 2008, using the civil procedure of a public interest bankruptcy petition. At that time, UK regulators discovered that at least one million UK and Irish citizens had been churned through 'Amway' during the period 1973-2006. It was also estimated that up to $ one billion dollars could have been stolen via the sale of so-called'training and motivation'materials. The main UK-registered corporate fronts for this secondary part of the 'Amway' racket were voluntarily closed, and their bosses excommunicated from 'Amway', evidently to prevent further investigation. However, UK regulators had found it difficult to trace victims. Most remained silent out of shame and embarrassment, but also because they had been recruited by a friend or relative. Any 'Amway' victims who had approached Messrs.Howarth and Baldwin, were never directed to the authorities or to the media. Instead, they were either persuaded that 'Amway' is neither a cult nor a fraud, and that there was nothing that could be done, or they were taken to 'Amway UK,' where presumeably limited-compensation was offered in return for their silence.
I would contend that, due to their long-term paid efforts to gather and silence 'MLM' victims, Messrs Baldwin and Howarth are partly-responsible for the current situation in the UK, where it is claimed that in excess of 630 000 persons (more than 90% of whom are women) are under contract to 'Amway' and its copy-cats - 'Herbalife', 'Forever Living Products', 'NuSkin', Mary Kay',etc. . Again, it should be remembered that the hidden overall net-loss churn rate for 'MLM' participation is known to be effectively 100%. Literally millions of people have been, and continue to be, temporarily enslaved by these 'MLM' cults in Britain alone. It is already established beyond all reasonable doubt that (by design) effectively all 'MLM' contractors have ultimately abandoned (and will ultimately abandon) this economically-suicidal activity, after failing to generate an overall net-profit. Not-forgetting that in a significant number of cases, chronic 'MLM' adherence has not only resulted in destitution, the abandonment of traditional careers and education, the destruction of marriages, families and friendships, etc., but also in victims exhibiting chronic psychological deterioration symptoms and, in the very-worst cases, committing actual suicide.
Laughably, Messrs. Baldwin and Howarth have been variously reported in the UK media as having helped thousands of cult victims, and their relatives, in the UK. However, these frequent, glowing portraitsseem to be based largely on Messrs, Baldwin and Howarth's own unsubstantiated, and unchallenged, grandiose anecdotal statements about their own activities.These fantastic fairy stories have gradually been fed to the press (particularly, to one freelance journalist of their acquaintance). Sadly, these big lies have been repeated so often, that eventually they have become accepted as the truth.
For a while, Ian Howarth succeeded in infiltrating a pan-European federation of cult research/advice associations, FECRIS. In 2004, at my instigation, during a FECRIS conference in Marseilles (at which I was present), Mr. Howarth was privately invited by the board of FECRIS to participate in an internal enquiry (to be conducted by Anne Edelstam and Jean Pierre Jugla) into the extent of his connections with 'Amway.' At the time, I was not aware that Howarth had been working for other 'MLM' cults including 'Herbalife.'
Howarth's initial response, was to admit that, yes, he was a paid consultant to 'Amway UK Ltd.' He then told the astonished board members of FECRIS that he wanted the other FECRIS associations to pass any complaints they had received about 'Amway/MLM' to him, because he had already negotiated compensation for people who had lost money. It turned out that Howarth's trip to Marseille, and all his related-expenses, were actually being picked up by 'Amway.'
Howarth was given a series of written, common-sense questions about his 'Amway' connections by Anne Edelstam and Jean Pierre Jugla, which (not surprisingly) he flatly refused to respond to. However, before he could be kicked out of FECRIS, Mr. Howarth resigned and accused its board of 'behaving like a cult.' Howarth subsequently published a simplistic, and unoriginal, 44 page booklet entitled,'Cults, a Practical Guide.' Of course, this contained no mention of 'MLM/commercial'cults. This potentially-dangerous ommission, must have been influenced by 'AmwayMLM' money.
A couple of years ago, I was told by a colleague of Howarth that he no longer is employed by 'MLM companies, and that privately he admits that he made a mistake. However, it's a certainty that Howarth will have signed open-ended employment contracts with various 'MLM' front companies making it very difficult for him to face the truth publicly. Thus, to date (by his silence), he remains the de facto agent of racketeers. I for one would like to know exactly how much stolen money did he get in total?
As for Graham Baldwin, I have no idea if he is still employed by 'MLM' racketeers, but I would strongly suspect that he is. Again, he will almost-certainly have been obliged to sign open-ended gagging-agreements. However, I do know that (for years) Baldwin has been appealing to the UK public to give his charity £1.5 million to create a centre for training cult counsellors and for helping cult victims, where he and his associates, will offer pyschiatric therapy, counselling and legal advice. http://www.catalystcounselling.org.uk/fund-raising.html.
